| These specifications, developed by Mark Cohen, Jeff Alger and John Mazziotta, describe the performance and design requirements used to specify the magnetic imaging instrument to be upgraded at the Ahmanson-Lovelace Brain Mapping Center. This is a tentative set of specs and is still subject to review, discussion and revision.
Please note that some of the content is informational for the members of the Brain Mapping Division |
The intended use of the system is in high resolution rapid functional imaging of the head at up to echo-planar imaging rates. The functional imaging study will require the implementation of a wide variety of cognitive experimental protocols with the patient remaining still within the magnet. These will include the introduction of complex sensory stimuli including visual cues such as pictures, words, moving bars, flashing lights, and binocular images producing depth sensation, auditory (acoustic) stimuli such as stereophonic sounds over the majority of the human hearing range (ideally 20 Hz to 20 kHz). While we intend also to introduce tactile, olfactory and gustatory stimuli, we anticipate no special problems with these in the magnetic field.
In general, the system is intended to operate under IRB observation. Thus, not all features will require FDA approval. It should, however, be able to operate within an FDA approved mode.
The design necessitates that the subject have their head positioned inside of and RF coil, which is then placed concentrically inside of a "gradient coil" of somewhat larger diameter. While the RF coil is basically an open frame, the gradient set will probably be a light-proof solid device. Increasing the diameter of the gradient set will generally come at the price of decreased spatial resolution and performance.
It will be possible to bring both light and forced air into the "gradient coil" to improve patient acceptance. Presently, we expect that the RF coil will travel with the patient into the instrument, while the gradient coil will be fixed in place inside of the magnet, as shown below in cross section.
Note that any stimulation, recording and interventional devices must be placed within the approximately 1.5 inch clearance outside of the RF coil and inside of the gradient set. For reference, note that the whole body aperture in a standard clinical instrument is about 55 cm, as opposed to the approximately 80 cm in this drawing. For mechanical reasons, the vendor may decide to limit the new instrument to the lesser dimension as well (e.g., they may require the insertion of an additional tube of 55 cm diameter, primarily to ease the development of the patient table and comfort systems.
| Basic Magnet: | |
|---|---|
| Field Strength | 3.0 Tesla |
| Shim | The field homogeneity of less than or equal to 0.1 r.m.s. ppm over a 24 cm DSV is to be determined using image-based methods and the shim currents are to be automatically calculated.
The system must be demonstrated to shim a typical human head to this value with vendor-supplied tools. Determination of the necessary shim terms to achieve this value are the the responsibility of the vendor. |
| Shim Drift | less than or equal to 0.05 ppm / hour |
| Cryogens | The capacity of the contractor supplied cryogen storage directly supporting the magnet shall be sufficient to operate the MRI scanner system for seven (7) consecutive days at full magnet strength without requiring cryogen refill. Loss of 50% of the tank cryogen shall not result in a quench of the magnet.
Refills of He should be no more than 4 times annually. Nitrogen refills should be required no more than monthly. A cryogen monitor should make an audible alarm if a system quench is imminent |
| Reliquifier or pump | If a reliquifier or refrigeration pump is included: There must be a setback timer that can allow the pump to restart automatically after being disabled for a safe period of not less than 10 minutes The pump must restart automatically in the event of transient power loss |
| Safety | The system must provide an oxygen level sensor to warn of unsafe low oxygen levels. |
| Clear Bore | greater than or equal to 55 cm |
| Gradient System: On all axes: |
|
|---|---|
| Amplitude | greater than or equal to 3.6 gauss/cm (1) |
| Rise Time (if linear) | less than or equal to 0.18 msec to 5.5 gauss/cm (2) |
| EPI Readout Frequency | greater than or equal to 1.4 kHz |
| Duty Cycle | greater than or equal to 60% for any 10 minute interval with a 10 minute cool down |
| Alternative Gradient Spec (on three axes) | |
| Area in 714 usec | > 8.1851E-04 gauss-sec/cm, or 1.5 mm resolution with 1400 Hz EPI |
| Overall: | |
|
|
No explicit mention was made in the prior specifications of the acoustical requirements. While we envision the use of active noise cancellation techniques to moderate the noise of the gradient set, it will be necessary as well to rigidly mount the gradient coil apparatus to reduce vibration. A sound pressure level of less than 65 dB, A-weighted, for the gradients operating in EPI sequences (e.g. 1400 Hz oscillation at 3.5 gauss/cm) is required with the vendor supplied sound attenuation equipment).
Based on data from NASA, the USAF and the RAF, in order to fit 90% of subjects, the head coil requirements have been specified as outlined below.
As shown in the figure, the required imaging volume is approximately cylindrical, with dimensions 24 x 24 x 20 cm (X x Y x Z). Within that volume, the RF receive/transmit uniformity is to be ± 10% P-P using a loaded phantom. The gradients are to be linear within ± 7.5 % over the same region.
In the sketch, a circular gradient set is assumed, with an aperture, at the inferior end, of 35 cm. The imaging volume is to be centered 22 cm above the opening. Obviously, a number of other possibilities exist to fulfill the applications requirement. For example, it would be reasonable to consider a larger linear volume along the z-axis, but with its isocenter displaced superiorly, compared to the drawing. A larger diameter would be entirely acceptable, too, in order to achieve the required transverse linearity.
|
|
|
| A problem we have seen in prior implementations of gradient insert systems is that the magnet isocenter is not aligned with the physical center of the brain (as the brain is not in the center of the head) in the A-P dimension. As a result, the usable field of view does not always cover the brain (as indicated above). | As this is unacceptable, we propose an alternative in which the RF head coil is properly slotted to allow the head to be displaced anteriorly, as sketched.
A cushion is used to support the head, as needed. |
|
Due to the high operational frequency (128 MHz) and to the field-dependent deleterious effects of magnetic susceptibility on the images, the instrument will be required to operate with a relatively short echo-planar readout period. We anticipate that a scan duration of 360 µsec per line will be adequate (1400 Hz EPI oscillation frequency). We desire a pixel size of better than 3 mm with a 360 microsec readout. The gradient-time product required is calculated as: At=1/(gamma x d), where A is the gradient strength in gauss/cm, t is the readout time in seconds, d is the resolution (0.3 cm) and gamma is the gyromagnetic ratio of 4258 Hz/gauss. Thus, At is 0.78283 gauss-ms/cm. For a sinusoidal readout waveform, and a 360 microsec readout, this gives a gradient strength of: Pi x (0.78283 gauss-ms/cm)/2(0.36 ms) = 3.416 gauss/cm, which is increased by 5% to enable tune-up and fractional k-space acquisition for a final gradient strength of 3.6 gauss/cm for the 1400 Hz sinusoid. Other waveforms with equivalent area (0.783 gauss-ms/cm) are acceptable. For example, a trapezoid with a 100 microsec rise and fall time and a 160 microsec flat top, having an amplitude of 3.15 gauss/cm would be equally acceptable. |
For illustrative purposes, we have developed an interactive spreadsheet (pc-version macintosh version) that explains these tradeoffs, which include minimization of blurring and shape distortion, and specifies the nominal power requirements of the gradient amplifiers:
Rapid gradient switching rates are known to cause sensory stimulation in whole body gradient sets at a threshold of about 60 T/sec r.m.s. (though in our experience some subjects perceive effects at 30 T/sec). Several factors favor head imaging:
| We have therefore set as a target, a maximum dB/dt within the patient area, of not more than 50 T/sec r.m.s., the patient area being defined by the drawing below: |
|---|
| ADC System: | |
|---|---|
| Sampling Frequency | greater than or equal to 750 kHz (24 cm FOV, 2X sampling) |
| Sampling Depth | at least 14 bits at 750 kHz |
| Sampling Resolution | less than or equal to 0.05 microsec |
| Audio Filters | 350 kHz (i.e. +/- 175kHz) |
| Multiple Receivers | The system must include at least four independent receivers in support of phased array and SMASH-type imaging |
| Duty Cycle | greater than or equal to 60% continuous |
| Global Performance/Stability Using the following pulse protocol: |
|
|---|---|
| General purpose phantom (e.g. w/resolution features) | Single shot (EPI) acquisition |
| 2 x 2 x 8 mm voxels (conjugate synthesis OK)* | TE 50 msec |
| 128 x 128 matrix (25 cm FOV) | TR 3 seconds |
| Gradient Echo (no 180 pulse) | Five slice locations |
| Head receiver coil | 1000 serially collected images |
| 45 degree flip angle | |
| *or equivalent 32 mm3 voxel volume | |
| Intensity variation on the magnitude image, through time (after reaching the phantom magnetic equilibrium) shall be no more than 0.5% peak to peak over any spatially contiguous 64 voxel region contained within the phantom over the entire 1000 image sample set, and prior to any intensity correction or normalization on a per image basis.
Intensity can be analyzed according to the stability protocol on the Brain Mapping web pages |
|
| Console: | |
|---|---|
| Data Handling | Sufficient Raw Data store for 3,000 images (128x128) at 10 images/second (about 128 MBytes).
Data Storage and Management for greater than or equal to 10,000 images/patient. Fully automated transfer of the data, in real time (i.e., <0.08 s/image), to a standard UNIX, windows, or NT cross mountable file system of either the images or raw data. The files should be saved in a publicly available data format. Prefered formats include Analyze 4D, AFNI (.BRIK), MINC, or a mutually agreeable format that includes sufficient descriptinve information for subsequent processing. Alternatively, the software should provide readily accessible hooks for file transfer via socket connections. |
| Recon target | 100 msec per image, including DC correct, half Fourier, time reverse, etc... |
| cpu | Unix-compatible operating system preferred Industry Standard (Sun, DEC, HP, SGI ) cpu's preferred TCP/IP, ftp support for data transfer |
| User Interface | Cine display of greater than or equal to 256 images Graphic Prescription for and from EPI images Support for Inexpensive (e.g. 8 mm tape) archive devices |
| Pulse Programming: Full license and access to sequence programming, including all necessary compilers and computer platform, if required for development of sequences and embedded image reconstrction, processing and display |
|
|---|---|
| Training | Training for at least 2 BMC personnel |
| Control of Sampling | to 0.05 microsec |
| At least two TTL compatible external channels | Additional programmable waveform channel desirable |
The pulse sequences available shall include but not limited to:
| RF System: | |
|---|---|
| Head Coil | greater than or equal to 27 cm diameter |
| Transmit/Receive Uniformity | better than 10% P-P over 24 cm |
| Possible "Body Coil" (transmit) for surface coil use (3) | Sufficient Dia. for head use |
| 3. We desire the capability to perform surface coil receive experiments for imaging and spectroscopy. To do so, we must have a transmitter that uniformly excites the imaging volume and a means of decoupling the receiver system. The vendor should provide either the complete coil setupo (including a 4" receiver coil and head-sized transmit coil), technical consultation to build such a system, and/or example schematics for decoupling circuitry. It is understood that such a system will be operable only under IRB supervision. | |
| Spectroscopic Capbailities: | |
|---|---|
| Frequencies | Proton only to be delivered
The system should be capable of upgrade to include at least the following NMR nuclei: 13C, 31P, 19F, 23NA, 7Li |
| Sequences |
|
| Sequence Features |
|
| Pulse Sequence Evaluation | The vendor will demonstrate that there is a less than 10% degradation in signal-to-noise ratio attributable to the use of localizing MRS pulse sequences compared to unlocalized sequences. |